Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM Bedienungsanleitung PDF herunterladen (Seite 5)

Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance on Microsoft Windows

Vista of Intel vPro technology-based and AMD processor-based PCs

in common business scenarios

Figure 2: Median test times, in seconds, for both test systems on all five scenarios. Lower numbers are better.

Test results and analysis

In this section we examine the results of each of our tests. Figure 2 shows the times, in seconds, that each test

system needed to complete each scenario. The times we show for each platform for each scenario are from the

median run of the five test runs of that scenario on that platform. (We defined the median run as the one with the

median sum of the times of its timed tasks.)

Tests

AMD Athlon 64 X2

5200+ processor on

ASUS M2NBP-VM CSM

Intel vPro with Core 2

Duo processor E6700

n Intel DQ965GF

Communications and collaboration

Opening a compressed Outlook XML file attachment (FG) 15.41 13.56

Microsoft Groove 2007 sync (BG) 50.39 22.79

Intuit QuickBooks scenario

Viewing a set of reports in Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006 5.20 4.15

Excel recalculation scenario

Recalculating business revenue using Microsoft Excel

45.41 28.55

Monte Carlo simulation

Running a Monte Carlo simulation in Microsoft Excel 2007 5.83 4.63

Dual-monitor Windows Vista Aero scenario

View a slideshow while a video plays (tester analysis) choppy smooth

Play an HD video (tester analysis) poor smooth

We explain the dual-monitor scenario's results in the Test results section on the dual-monitor scenario. Basically,

the Intel vPro technology-based PC with the Intel Core 2 Duo processor E6700 had no problems during the

slideshow transitions or with the HD video playback, while the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor-based PC

paused between all slide transitions and had poor HD video playback, with significant video glitches covering

approximately 40 percent of the screen during the playback.

In the following sub-sections we explore these results in more detail. To make comparisons easier, we always

show results normalized to those of the slower system, the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor-based PC. To

compute those normalized results, we divided the other system’s time by the time it took the slower system. The

result for the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor-based PC is thus always 1.00, because it’s the comparison

basis. Results higher than 1.00 indicate how much faster the Intel vPro technology-based PC with the Intel Core 2

Duo processor E6700 is than that system. Because of the normalization, higher result numbers are better. For

example, a result of 1.80 would mean the Intel vPro technology-based PC with the Intel Core 2 Duo processor

E6700 was 80 percent faster than the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor-based PC.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 37 38

Keine Kommentare

Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM Bedienungsanleitung Seite 5