
7
Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance on Microsoft Windows
Vista of Intel vPro technology-based and AMD processor-based PCs
in common business scenarios
Viewing data in Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006
As Figures 5 and 6 show, the Intel vPro technology-based PC with the Intel Core 2 Duo processor E6700 was
1.25 times faster
than the AMD Athlon
64 X2 5200+
processor-based PC
on this test.
Figure 6 shows that
this difference meant
that the Intel vPro
technology-based PC
with the Intel Core 2
Duo processor
E6700 finished the
task more than a
second faster than
the AMD Athlon 64
X2 5200+ processor-
based PC.
PERFORMANCE RESULTS
(seconds)
COMPARATIVE RATING
AMD Athlon 64 X2
5200+ processor on
ASUS M2NBP-VM CSM
Intel vPro with Core 2
Duo processor E6700
on Intel DQ965GF
TASKS
AMD Athlon 64 X2
5200+ processor on
ASUS M2NBP-VM CSM
Intel vPro with Core 2
Duo processor E6700
on Intel DQ965GF
5.20 4.15
Task: Viewing
memorized
reports in
QuickBooks
1.00 1.25
Figure 6: Results for the Intuit QuickBooks scenario for both test systems. Lower performance results are better. Higher
comparative ratings are better.
Figure 5: Normalized results for the Intuit QuickBooks scenario for both test systems. Larger
numbers indicate better performance.
Intuit QuickBooks scenario
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
iew ing mem orized reports in
Intuit Quick Books Pro 2006
Performance relative to AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
processor-based PC
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
processor-based PC
Intel vPro technology based
PC w ith Intel Core 2 Duo
processor E6700
Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern